Whether you subscribe to the idea that de Vattel's "Law of Nations" definition of Natural Born Citizen should be applicable to Obama, or whether you believe the US Sup Ct's explanation in the historic Wong Kim Ark case should be a foundation for Obama to claim Natural Born Citizenship **IF** he can ever show actual lawful proof of citizenship birth within the United States (and there are some mutations to those base legal arguments), it would seem the question will never be answered without seeing the actual, real, doctor-handsigned birth certificate. Therefore, after extensive review of practically the entire United States Code, this is the summary of the most relevant legal mandates ("shall", "shall not") that should be put into play:
Concerning the whole “birther” eligibility question regarding Mr. Obama/Soetoro, it is mere child’s play to point out the obvious statutory mandates of the United States Code in control of the entire matter, e.g.:  that all of Barack’s same such records of constitutional importance are expressly not protected to any privacy, whatsoever, 44 U.S.C. § 2201; further, that  Barack does not even own those records, anymore, because, as ‘President’, they are now owned solely by the United States (i.e., owned by We The People..), 44 U.S.C. § 2202; even further, that  Barack’s duty under law, mandated, has always been to ensure those same records -- like the constitutional eligibility proof of his true and legal long-form birth certificate -- are actually made *public domain*, see 44 U.S.C. §§ 2203 and 2204, then 5 U.S.C. § 552; moreover, that  Attorney General Eric Holder is now also subject to immediate removal from office, 28 U.S.C. §§ 528, 530B, 547 and 591, due to his unlawful, direct conflicts-of-interest in attempting, whatsoever, to defend Barack from ANY questions involving oath, naturalization, loyalty, eligibility or citizenship, because  Mr. Holder has *statutory mandates* to BOTH, avoid representation for.., AND to *prosecute* Barack in.., any such issues, e.g., 2 U.S.C. §§ 118a, 288c, 288h and 288k, also 8 U.S.C. §§ 1103, 1227, 1501, and etc.; and, finally, that  any ‘mere’ Citizen has expressly-provided standing to directly sue over these matters, once again as child’s play to achieve, under a variety of express statutory authority, AND also via express Constitutional authority, e.g., 2 U.S.C. § 437h, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702 and 706, 26 U.S.C. § 9011, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-9, and Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, also Article IV, Section 4, Clause 1, and also Amendment XIV, Section 2.