Elections: President Trump, refusing to back down from his claim that millions of illegal votes tipped the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, now wants a comprehensive review of voter integrity in the United States. Whatever Trump's motivation for his claim, it's the right call.
Shortly after the election, Trump said that he would have won the popular vote — which he lost by nearly 3 million votes — if it weren't for "millions of illegal voters."
That sent the mainstream press into a fit of apoplexy, with journalist and left-wing activists denouncing Trump's claim as pure fabrication from a sore winner.
They went into another rage when Trump restated the claim in a meeting with lawmakers this week. The New York Times, which never called Obama out on his many abject lies, declared in its news pages that "Trump Repeats Lie About Popular Vote in Meeting With Lawmakers."
As we noted in this space before, there is evidence of ineligible voters casting ballots, citing studies that showed how outdated and slipshod voter registrations make it at least possible for noncitizens, and even illegal aliens, to vote. (A Pew Center study found that one out of every eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date or a duplicate.)
We pointed to 2014 study in the online Electoral Studies Journal which found, alarmingly, that "noncitizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress."
The mainstream press has dismissed that study, pointing out that a Harvard Team found flaws in the methodology. But the Harvard team also declared that "the likely percent of noncitizen voters in recent U.S. elections is 0."
Whatever the flaws of the 2014 study, we know for a fact that the number of noncitizen voters is more than zero.
This week, John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky, who have both tracked voter fraud extensively, detailed multiple specific examples of noncitizens casting ballots .... Among them:
These may seem like small potatoes. But as Fund and von Spakovsky point out, "we don't know how big of a problem voter fraud really is because no systematic effort has ever been made to investigate it."
That's a knowledge gap that needs to be filled in, and Democrats should eagerly embrace such an effort.
After all, they are the ones who keep insisting that we have to "count every vote" and "every vote counts." Well, every single vote cast by an ineligible voter cancels out one legitimate ballot, which means that any level of fraud should be intolerable.
Plus, if Trump is wrong about the scale of voter fraud, a thorough investigation is the only way to prove it.
Somehow, we doubt Democrats will see it this way.
Me Here......We have often heard about the dead voting in Chicago and "Vote early and often." Well, both are true and not funny!
This is a national scandal of unknown, but not insignificant proportions. Every vote by anyone that shouldn't vote pollutes the system. It lessens the vote of legal voters. That is you and me!
In Michigan during the recount, it surely appears that over voting occurred in many precincts around Detroit, a Democrat stronghold. If it had been done more, Hillary could have won in Michigan. Maybe that is why Hillary barely campaigned in Michigan. She thought she had stuffed the ballot boxes enough that Trump couldn't win. She lost and now the Secretary of State is investigating.
We need the voter rolls purged all across the nation of the dead and non-citizens. This should be a no brainer. Yet the Democrats always fight this. Why? The only logical answer is to enable the Democrats to cheat in elections.
It is time to amend Motor Voter to mandate proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. This is a most reasonable standard. Not doing it discriminates against legal voters. Not doing it corrupts the system.
Voting is a right and privilege of being a citizen of the Untied States.