Patriots Heart Network Media #phnm

"...what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?” “A Republic, if you can keep it

More on Usurper Soetoro ABUSES the VA to DISARM Vets!!!!

Written By Constitutional Attorney Michael Connelly, J.D.

How would you feel if you received a letter from the U.S. Government informing you that because of a physical or mental condition that the government says you have it is proposing to rule that you are incompetent to handle your own financial affairs? Suppose that letter also stated that the government is going to appoint a stranger to handle your affairs for you at your expense? That would certainly be scary enough but it gets worse.

What if that letter also stated: “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”?

That makes is sound like something right from a documentary on a tyrannical dictatorship somewhere in the world. Yet, as I write this I have a copy of such a letter right in front of me. It is being sent by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to hundreds, perhaps thousands, of America’s heroes. In my capacity as Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF) I have been contacted by some of these veterans and the stories I am getting are appalling.

The letter provides no specifics on the reasons for the proposed finding of incompetency; just that is based on a determination by someone in the VA. In every state in the United States no one can be declared incompetent to administer their own affairs without due process of law and that usually requires a judicial hearing with evidence being offered to prove to a judge that the person is indeed incompetent. This is a requirement of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that states that no person shall “… be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law…”.

Obviously, the Department of Veterans Affairs can’t be bothered by such impediments as the Constitution, particularly since they are clearly pushing to fulfill one of Obama’s main goals, the disarming of the American people. Janet Napolitano has already warned law enforcement that some of the most dangerous among us are America’s heroes, our veterans, and now according to this letter from the VA they can be prohibited from buying or even possessing a firearm because of a physical or mental disability.

Think about it, the men and women who have laid their lives on the line to defend us and our Constitution are now having their own Constitutional rights denied. There are no clear criteria for the VA to declare a veteran incompetent. It can be the loss of a limb in combat, a head injury, a diagnosis of PTSD, or even a soldier just telling someone at the VA that he or she is depressed over the loss of a buddy in combat. In none of these situations has the person been found to be a danger to themselves or others. If that was the case than all of the Americans who have suffered from PTSD following the loss of a loved one or from being in a car accident would also have to be disqualified from owning firearms. It would also mean that everyone who has ever been depressed for any reason should be disarmed. In fact, many of the veterans being deprived of their rights have no idea why it is happening.

The answer seems to be it is simply because they are veterans. At the USJF we intend to find the truth by filing a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Veterans Affairs to force them to disclose the criteria they are using to place veterans on the background check list that keeps them from exercising their Second Amendment rights. Then we will take whatever legal steps are necessary to protect our American warriors.

The reality is that Obama will not get all of the gun control measures he wants through Congress, and they wouldn’t be enough for him anyway. He wants a totally disarmed America so there will be no resistance to his plans to rob us of our nation. That means we have to ask who will be next. If you are receiving a Social Security check will you get one of these letters? Will the government declare that you are incompetent because of your age and therefore banned from firearm ownership. It certainly fits in with the philosophy and plans of the Obama administration. It is also certain that our military veterans don’t deserve this and neither do any other Americans.

-- Michael Connelly, J.D.

Executive Director, United States Justice Foundation

Views: 34


You need to be a member of Patriots Heart Network Media #phnm to add comments!

Join Patriots Heart Network Media #phnm

Comment by SGT William A. Geresy (ret) on March 7, 2013 at 9:54pm

Ann, a minor point, but please spell my name right.  GERESY 


I don't claim to be Army, but Michigan Army National Guard.  That is a State military force under the control of the Governor of the state.


All military members very, very early in basic training are given a class on Legal vs Illegal orders.  That is a most important point to remember.  We are trained to obey only lawful orders and ignore all others.  I have had it happen to me, but very seldom.  I did the right thing.


We are NOT deaf, dumb, and blind.  We are on so many levels smarter than our peers in civilian life.  SoS Kerry is clueless as to his remark when he ran for President.


We are bound by oath to the US Constitution and not to any individual as CiC whether Federal or State.  That is important to remember.


I have a pretty high confidence having served in both the Active Air Force and MI Army National Guard that the people know right from wrong.  They will not follow orders to "attack" their fellow citizens inside America.  They just will not.  They will turn in rank and leave the service.  They will walk.  And who knows what toys will walk with them.


Ann, you do bring up a valid point with the Army redistributing a donation.  That is wrong and needs to be addressed both in the system and out.  In the system is the Inspector General.  That person should be called in to investigate.  Also one can make calls for investigation to their US Reps and Senators.  This can also go to the White House when we have a President.


One can also go to the press, their State Attorney General or even to Court.


There are many ways to stop this.


Ann, the Soldiers I still deal with have nothing to do with Agenda 21.  They will not do any part of it.  They are professionals to defend the nation against ALL ENEMIES and with the Guard to aid and assist the state in times of emergencies. 

Comment by Ann Duval on March 7, 2013 at 6:09pm
Sgt Garisy, Based on your above post regarding discriminatory and unconstitutional practices against U.S. Veterans, I thought you may want to read this as well. It is quite stunning.

U.S. Army "Redistributes" Charity Donation: Donor told he cannot give to the church of his choice - the Army will decided where the money should go!
by Ann L. Duval
U.S. Army "Redistributes" Charity Donation: Donor told he cannot give to the church of his choice - the Army will decided where the money should go! My friends, American freedom has fled!

This was sent by a friend who is a West Point graduate and 'Nam combat veteran. It appears all wealth must be 'redistributed' -- even voluntary contributions, i.e. donations are being confiscated. I wonder if this is to make sure the new Mosques get their "Fair Share?" Does anyone see the correlation to Hitler’s Germany?

This was sent to a classmate by another alumnus.

Subject: usma1979-discussion: Dept of Army takes over Church funds.

I received a letter from the Dept. of the Army (West Point) thanking me for my contribution to the Most Holy Trinity Catholic Church at West Point. The letter accepting my check should come from the Church. I was surprised. I called the number on the letter and spoke to a Chaplain Fund Manager, an SFC.

He told me that my contribution no longer goes to the Church but to the Dept. of Army general Chaplain’s Fund for distribution to the Church. What happened to separation of Church and State?

It gets worse. My wife and I HAD intended to gift a large sum to the Most Holy Trinity Church upon our demise. We were informed that ...that portion of our gift that caused the Church budget to exceed 30% of the Church budget would be CONFISCATED by the Dept. of the Army and redistributed to wherever the Department of the Army determined it should go within the overall global Army church budgets. I understood this to mean that in essence my gift could end up in the hands of any denomination and any church other than the Most Holy Trinity at West Point. I find this offensive. Worse yet I consider it a violation of my rights to give to my church without government interference or intervention. Now this estate gift from us will go elsewhere. Dept. of the Army has no right to seize my gift yet they will.

Does anyone know about this? ____
NOTE: (Ann Duval) No one need to wonder whose side the U.S. Army will be on when the rogue government tries to overpower us – The U.S. Army is now very neatly packaged in New World Order, United Nations, Agenda 21 – it appears the U.S. Army is now “global” rather than the “U.S. Army.”

© 2021   Created by Chalice.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service